182
Development finance in an era of fragmentation The MDB system evolved to support an international order marked by expanding trade integration, macroeconomic interdependence and a broad, if imperfect, commitment to multilateral cooperation. That construct is now stressed by various factors. Strategic rivalry among major powers, sanctions regimes, wars, trade fragmentation, sovereign debt distress and climate-induced shocks have introduced dynamic uncertainty into the system. Little wonder that UN Secretary-General António Guterres remarked at the 2023 BRICS Summit in Johannesburg that “the global financial architecture is outdated, dysfunctional and unjust. It has failed in its basic function as a global safety net — and so it needs deep structural reform.” Regionally anchored, market-funded MDBs Regional anchoring enhances political legitimacy and reduces vulnerability to external geopolitical pressures. The African Development Fund’s seventeenth replenishment (ADF-17), which mobilized approximately US$11 billion, was achieved in late 2025 with contributions from 23 African countries, compared to ADF-16 which was only backed by a handful of African countries. This signals an important step toward regional ownership and control of concessional finance resources. Similarly, recent capital increases of institutions such as the Black Sea Trade and Development Bank (BSTDB) and Afreximbank have significantly strengthened subscribed capital, reinforcing regional balance- sheet capacity. Regional ownership aligns incentives. Member states support institutions that directly advance regional integration, trade corridors, energy security and industrial upgrading. In Latin America, IDB Invest, the private sector arm of the Inter-American Development Bank, secured a US$3.5 billion capital increase to scale private-sector mobilization. The European Investment Bank and European Commission have expanded guarantee frameworks under Global Gateway, a platform to invest in infrastructure projects worldwide, to leverage €5 billion in additional funding. Afreximbank went even further in 2017 with an innovative structure to raise capital through depositary receipts listed on the Mauritius stock exchange, raising about US$300 million. Financial scalability through market access enhances autonomy. Regionally anchored institutions, such as Afreximbank and CAF — Development Bank of Latin America and the Caribbean have long relied on capital market issuances, structured trade finance instruments and diversified funding bases to sustain lending growth and countercyclical response. These practices demonstrate how regional MDBs combine public mandates with commercial funding discipline. Can MDBs thrive under plurilateral multilateralism? A bloc-based plurilateral system of development finance (regional MDBs) would likely fragment standards, reduce risk pooling, complicate sovereign debt coordination and increase tied finance. However, modular multilateralism is feasible. Regional MDBs can cooperate through co-financing, exposure exchanges, guarantee platforms and interoperable standards, even if global consensus weakens. The model preserves multilateral coordination while decentralizing balance sheet power. In Africa, the Alliance of Multilateral Financial Institutions (AAMFI), created in February 2024, serves as a platform for pooling risk capacity, risk management, sharing credit information and coordinating responses to common problems.
Powered by FlippingBook